Because the Archive offered and unmetered bandwidth (paid for by grants and donations), it became the perfect CDN for piracy. A user on a forum like Reddit (founded that same year) or Something Awful would post a direct link to an Archive file. The download would max out a T1 line, and the Archive footed the bill.
They were wrong about the law. But they were right about the culture. This article is a historical analysis of user behavior and copyright norms in 2005. The Internet Archive now operates in full compliance with copyright law, and users should respect the intellectual property of rights holders. internet archive pirates 2005
Founded by Brewster Kahle in 1996, the Archive’s mission was universal access to all knowledge. By 2005, it had accumulated petabytes of data. But unlike the specialized torrent trackers of the era (Suprnova, Demonoid), the Archive had one massive advantage: Because the Archive offered and unmetered bandwidth (paid
While The Pirate Bay was fending off lawsuits in Sweden, the Internet Archive operated out of the Presidio of San Francisco with a noble mission. Most ISPs and university network administrators didn’t block archive.org because it hosted presidential speeches and Grateful Dead soundboards. But lurking in the subdirectories were digital treasures that copyright lawyers would weep over. In 2005, the user interface of the Internet Archive was spartan—mostly raw directory listings, FTP links, and simple HTML tables. For a pirate, this was paradise. They were wrong about the law
In the early morning hours of a dial-up connection in 2005, the digital world felt like a frontier. There were sheriffs (the RIAA, the MPAA), there were outlaws (Napster’s ghost, The Pirate Bay), and then there was a strange, legal library in San Francisco that everyone treated like a pirate ship: The Internet Archive.